<ul id="q6cau"><sup id="q6cau"></sup></ul>
<ul id="q6cau"></ul>
<abbr id="q6cau"></abbr>
<strike id="q6cau"><menu id="q6cau"></menu></strike>
  • <ul id="q6cau"></ul>
  • The Annual Explosion Proof Electric Technology & Equipment Event
    logo

    The 26thChina International Explosion Protection and Electric Technology & Equipment Exhibition

    ufi

    BEIJING,CHINA

    March 26-28,2026

    LOCATION :Home> News > Industry News

    Nigeria demands $62 billion from oil majors for past profits

    Pubdate:2019-10-11 15:39 Source:liyanping Click:

    ABUJA (Bloomberg) - Nigeria is seeking to recover as much as $62 billion from international oil companies, using a 2018 Supreme Court ruling the state says enables it to increase its share of income from production-sharing contracts.

    The proposal comes as President Muhammadu Buhari tries to bolster revenue after a drop in the output and price of oil, Nigeria’s main export. It’s previously targeted foreign companies, fining mobile operator MTN Group Ltd. almost $1 billion for failing to disconnect undocumented SIM-card users, and suing firms including JPMorgan Chase & Co. in a corruption scandal.

    In the latest plan, the government says energy companies failed to comply with a 1993 contract-law requirement that the state receive a greater share of revenue when the oil price exceeds $20 per barrel, according to a document prepared by the attorney-general’s office and the Justice Ministry. The document, seen by Bloomberg, was verified by the ministry.

    While the government hasn’t said how it will recover the money, it has said it wants to negotiate with the companies. In its battle with MTN, the fine imposed on the company was negotiated down from an initial penalty of $5.2 billion.

    Nigerian presidency spokesman Garba Shehu didn’t answer three phone calls or respond to a text message requesting comment.

    Under the production-sharing contract law, companies including Royal Dutch Shell Plc, ExxonMobil Corp., Chevron Corp., Total SA and Eni SpA agreed to fund the exploration and production of deep-offshore oil fields on the basis that they would share profit with the government after recovering their costs.

    When the law came into effect 26 years ago, crude was selling for $9.50 per barrel. The oil companies currently take 80% of the profit from these deep-offshore fields, while the government receives 20%, according to the document. Oil traded at $58.29 a barrel on the London-based ICE Futures Europe Exchange.

    Most of Nigeria’s crude is pumped by the five oil companies, which operate joint ventures and partnerships with the state-owned Nigerian National Petroleum Corp.

    Representatives of the oil companies met Justice Minister Abubakar Malami Oct. 3 in the capital, Abuja, according to two people familiar with the discussions who asked not to be identified because the meeting wasn’t public. Malami told them that while no hostility is intended toward investors, the government will ensure all the country’s laws are respected, the people said.

    Ruling Challenged

    Oil companies including Shell have gone to the Federal High Court to challenge the government’s claim that they owe the state any money, arguing that the Supreme Court ruling doesn’t allow the government to collect arrears. They also contend that because the companies weren’t party to the 2018 case, they shouldn’t be subject to the ruling.

    “We do not agree with the legal basis for the claim that we owe outstanding revenues,” Shell’s Nigerian unit said in an emailed response to questions.

    Chevron spokesman Ray Fohr said the company doesn’t comment on matters before the court. Its units in Nigeria “comply with all applicable laws and regulations,” he said by email.

    Exxon and Total declined to comment, while Eni officials didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

    The Supreme Court ruling followed a lawsuit by states in Nigeria’s oil-producing region seeking interpretation of the nation’s production-sharing law. The states argued that they weren’t receiving their full due. The court ruled in their favor and asked the attorney general and justice minister to take steps to recover the outstanding revenue.

    The 1993 law required that its provisions be reviewed after 15 years and subsequently every five years. The attorney-general’s office insists that the provision for a higher share of revenue doesn’t require legislative action to take effect, according to the document.

    “Instead it imposes a duty on the oil companies and contracting parties, being NNPC, to by themselves review the sharing formula,” the ministry said.

    久久久久国产精品嫩草影院| 国产成人精品免费视频软件| 亚洲AV乱码久久精品蜜桃| 精品国产午夜肉伦伦影院| 日韩免费毛片视频| 日韩电影无码A不卡| 老牛精品亚洲成av人片| 亚洲午夜精品久久久久久app| 亚洲国产精品专区| 精品午夜福利在线观看| 久久亚洲国产精品| 国产麻豆精品一区二区三区v视界| 国产偷国产偷高清精品| 亚洲精品老司机在线观看| 牛牛在线精品免费视频观看| 日韩人妻无码精品久久免费一 | 国产精品美女久久久久浪潮AV| 国产91久久精品一区二区| **毛片免费观看久久精品| 日韩一区精品视频一区二区| 亚洲色图国产精品| 久久久久国产精品免费免费不卡| 国内精品久久久久伊人av| 色妞www精品视频| 尹人久久久香蕉精品| 中文字幕久热精品视频在线| 亚洲精品国产电影| 国产高清在线精品一区小说| www.久久精品| 国产精品成人久久久久三级午夜电影| 精品福利一区3d动漫| 牛牛在线精品观看免费正| 国产精品日韩专区| 日韩在线看片中文字幕不卡 | 精品无码成人片一区二区 | 少妇人妻偷人精品无码视频 | 亚洲精品视频在线免费| 91精品久久久久久久99蜜桃 | 国产成人精品一区二区A片带套| 精品无人区麻豆乱码无限制 | 日韩成人在线视屏|